FREQUENCIES TRAVELER NOVEMBER 15, 2016 Dream Weavers... Dream Catchers... Dreamtime... Sweet Dreams... Dreamland... Dream On... 'the stuff that dreams are made of'...DreamWorks... Dreamy... 'Once Upon a Dream'... 'In your dreams'... DreamWorld... Daydream... Dream Interpretation.... The nature of thought... Freedom of Thought... Freedom of Ideas or Concepts... Freedom of Speech. "Why would I consider thought and ideas -- English Language words -- to represent entirely different things? Because..." "Because?" I hear repeating... "Because.." "Because thought and idea ARE different things. Related concepts but entirely different things. Like the way that hydrogen and H2O are related and yet very different things. Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. So we think of hydrogen as an ingredient of the compound of water. Thought is compared here to hydrogen, an element or ingredient or essential energy of the compound which we think of as idea or concept. We take the fundamental thought, combine with others and create or generate an idea or concept. And so they relate to each other but are not identical. 'I think; therefore, I am,' Descartes' famous line, indicates the more fundamental and elemental of the two is "thought or thought-form," a building block, if you will. We build concepts with thought. Without thought element or energy, would we cease to exist? Certainly, the Shakespearean phrase, 'To be or not to be: that is the question' (I paraphrase the line a bit.) elaborates upon the theme. With the element of thought we become aware and communicative and alive. Using our free will in our choices of the use and combinations of thought, we create concepts or destroy them." "Example?" I hear. "Okay. Here is one: If I choose to think and to use thought in forming the idea/concept that 'I AM a peaceful human being,' I am building and creating myself to become a peaceful human being. Likewise, if I form the concept, using thought as idea's element, that I AM NOT a peaceful human being,' then I am destroying the concept of building and creating a peaceful human being. With phrases such as 'I am' and 'I am not,' we, many times a day, develop ourselves to be or not to be many diverse things. We become creators and destroyers daily in our lives. 'I am pretty.' 'I am too fat.' 'I am getting old.' 'I am not the violent type.' 'I am afraid.' 'I love.' 'I hate.' 'I feel.' Philosophers and mystics have long explained some of the nature of reality as we 'perceive' it to be while on this plane. We use the terms 'biological cell' and 'body' separately and yet understand how related they actually are. When I speak about the individual cell or its components, one does not automatically assume that I speak of its entire community of related organisms which accumulate to become the human body. If I ask a child to show me a human body and then, subsequently, to show me one individual biological cell, the educated child can easily point to an illustration of each." "What happens, though, when I ask that same child to point out, first, an idea and, later, to show me a thought? Where is the illustration? What is a thought? What does a thought look like? What does a thought feel like and does it have temperature, color or movement? Does it flow like a wave or vibrate like a particle? If it moves, at what speed, frequency, does it move, vibrate, flow or swim? Is thought inert? Is thought stagnant or deep or constantly in motion and light weight or shallow? When we feel thought in motion, is it that we are otherwise still and thought flows, is fleeting? Or do we give it motion or apparent motion? If I, myself, move all around, as children in energetic motion usually are, all around a non-moving object -- my eyeglass case is one example -- it will appear to move. And yet, I know that it is I, the viewer, who relocated. That which appeared to move might have remained still... or NOT... a different question for a different moment." "Do our ideas compose themselves from one thought/thought transfer or from an array of thoughts? Combined, recombined, programmed or random sensations and perceptions? Or, through our brains and personal electromagnetic selves-- higher self -- lower self -- daily conscious self (mind), does our brain play with this element/energy to make of it whatever it will?" I am making a point if it follows. "'Whatever it will: beyond a sensor or a meter, measuring pain or pleasure and protecting ourselves accordingly by dispersing electro-chemical shields or bio-chemical attractors... beyond this... beyond the basics of survival to creation: 'I AM.' Beyond the recreation of ourselves by replication or procreation, to creation of...WHAT? Where do our dreams play a role in our process of being not only a sensor or meter, survivor or even procreator; but, to the exploration of that which is so far not perceived -- that which, to all apparency -- remains the unknown?" "Go on..." You are listening now. "And, to what extent...?" I do go on with my soapbox. "To what extent are we programmed creatures, players in some other consciousness' game or game plan? Who does the programming in that case? If I or you are the Charley McCarthy, the puppet -- number two, -- who then is number one, the puppeteer? Yourself also? Simultaneously or prior travel and experience? ('Later' is 'prior' also if one travels from 'future' toward 'past.')" "Dream Catchers -- we love them, hang them on our bedroom windows. But... what are we 'catching?' From whence came the dream we catch? Are we more protected when we dream happy dreams than nightmares? Is either type of dream equally pretend or programming? Paper Tigers, Straw Men, laughing in the face of dragons or when being pursued by dinosaurs... dreams of flying followed by lucid dreaming... warnings of events on the horizon? School or communicating with number one puppeteer? Does the dreamer take the dream seriously? Should the dreamer reject the dream?" "Who created or transmitted the dream? Who transmits thought? If the dream is rejected, is the dreamer rejecting the dream's source? Is the source of the dream the dreamer? Is the recipient or tunnel/hallway/wormhole through which the dream passes also the dreamer? If one rejects the dream, who or what is being rejected?" I want to continue a moment more. "The young person on modern technology is quite certain that he or she knows certain causes and sources of certain types of phenonema. Yet, he or she knows only a piece of a piece about a piece of Virtual Reality or Ethernet or V2K (microwave) or various bio-electromagnetic inventions. Who invented the inventor or the thought and inspiration for the idea for the complex set of ideas which begin a process of research or development or hypothesis or, in some cases, of apparently instantly genius inventions or works of great art or music or poetry?" "Who invented the inventor or the thought? The religious will say God or Allah or another Almighty." I pause to be certain that you are still paying attention. I want to insert a very important consideration: "There are some young techies, you might already realize, however, who will respond inside your head to you and answer your most innermost prayers, pleas and thoughts, feelings and ideas -- the prayers you tell yourself are directed to the spiritual world or Other Side and discussed only in your Holy of Holies, The Inner Sanctum of personal private spaces inside your own 'mind." At espionage frequencies, or those frequencies heard inside your own head alone without your conscious use of attendant technology, intended to be private, the invading techie allows you to think, to form ideas, to even form ideas based upon his/her deception. He or she allows you to assume that he/she IS the being with whom one is often encouraged to enter into discourse: Deities or demons, archangels, Guardians, angels, deceased ancestors, outer-space alien intelligences or other biological entities not outwardly and obviously visual and vocal. Where, in this case, is the TRUTH OF EXISTANCE?" "One needs to seek BEYOND simple names or frequencies... the Frequency Traveler will encounter many types of beings and elementals, elements and thought-forms, frequency-forms and energy forms -- some of which are mischievous, some quite scary and some angelically beautiful. All of them are completely pretense or absolutely authentic. Which is which?" "Have you ever played Chess?" I ask you. "Imagine a game of Chess in which you take turns being one of the pieces being moved across the board, then the board itself, and finally, the player directing the pieces. Now, imagine that game of Chess is advanced and multi-level and multi-dimensional and one side is creation and the other side is destruction and continues...." "We are seeking beyond mental entities... or we allow mental entities... or both. The Frequency Traveler is alternately, or simultaneously, the traveler and the way traveled...." "In such scenarios, what role does accurate memory play?... remembering?... As I remember....and I remember.... I remember..." NEXT PAGE Copyright 2016-2022. Asha of Antares.Asha Ariel Aleia.All Rights Reserved. Background courtesy: Asha Ariel Aleia | |||||